Unable to benefit from HARP 2.0, FHA loan holders are being neglected

THE PROBLEM

For years, FHA has allowed existing homeowners with FHA insured loans to refinance to new rates without an appraisal. Similar to HARP, FHA streamline refinances have traditionally allowed homeowners to take advantage of lower rates with relaxed guidelines on home value. Without any new stimulus bills, speeches from the president, or elaborate media buzz, FHA streamline refinances have been helping millions of homeowners qualify for lower rates.

 

Unfortunately, some recent changes to the FHA guidelines have eliminated many homeowners from qualifying for a lower rate refinance. With politicians spending countless hours improving upon HARP, how could this key group of homeowners have been forgotten?

 

In 2006, FHA represented less than 4% of all home purchase loans. By 2010, FHA was being used for almost 20% of all purchases. This sudden spike in FHA loan origination instigated a series of changes to the program that included higher costs in the form of expensive mortgage insurance. This was a necessary change to help the funding of FHA loans.

 

The higher costs for newly originated loans are probably justified, but existing FHA borrowers refinancing to take advantage of new low rates are in for an unfortunate surprise. Here’s an example: if a homeowner had a $200,000 5% FHA 30-year fixed originated in 2009, they would have a payment of $1,165.31 with FHA mortgage insurance (a mortgage insurance rate of .55% annually at the time). If the same homeowner applied for an FHA streamline refinance in 2011 at 4%, their payment would only reduce to $1,146.50 (the current FHA mortgage insurance rate is 1.15%). Is it reasonable to spend thousands of dollars in closing costs to save less than $20 per month? Probably not.

 

One other interesting thing is that FHA is losing revenue by operating this way. FHA charges an upfront fee called an Upfront Mortgage Insurance Premium. On a streamline refinance the fee is reduced, but represents real income for FHA. Ultimately, millions of homeowners are not participating in the program, and are unnecessarily paying higher rates.

 

THE SOLUTION

In my mind the solution is simple. While it may be necessary for FHA to increase its costs, there is no real reason to charge more to existing homeowners with FHA loans. If FHA allows existing homeowners to keep their current monthly mortgage insurance costs, a homeowner can lower their rate and payment similarly to HARP. FHA can charge the homeowner a new upfront cost which most homeowners are happy to pay to benefit from a lower rate.

 

A colleague I spoke with indicated that FHA streamline refinances have a higher rate of default, which may be the reason FHA is imposing the higher costs. I can believe that this is true, and it is probably related to the loose FHA streamline guidelines. For example, they is no appraisal requirement, nor is there a debt-to-income ratio standard. (Note: Debt-to-income ratio is a calculation lenders use to identify whether a homeowner can afford a given monthly payment).

 

It is not clear to me why the FHA cannot change the guidelines to require a debt-to-income ratio calculation. As it stands now, a lender will allow homeowners to refinance on a FHA streamline loan without checking to see if they can afford the payment. For example, a homeowner could have a pay cut immediately after becoming over-extended with credit card debt. Under current FHA guidelines, this homeowner would qualify for an FHA streamline refinance. We can easily imagine how helpful a reduced payment could be for the homeowner, but clearly this is not the intent of the program. I would argue that the program could have a much larger impact were it to focus on the earlier group I spoke about.

 

One out of every six homes purchased since 2009 was closed using an FHA loan. Since 2009, values have declined further and many of the homeowners who purchased are now underwater without any refinance options to lower their payment. Spending time to improve HARP is a great thing, but there are millions of folks with FHA loans in the predicament described above. I talk with approximately one per day. If the government is serious about helping homeowners refinance their underwater mortgages, it’s time they undo the price hikes on FHA streamline refinances.

UPDATE 3/7/2012

Hats off to FHA for recognizing this problem.  The first step in fixing the problem has been implemented.  All FHA homeowners who received their FHA loan prior to May 31st, 2009 can refinance on a new FHA loan with reduced mortgage insurance premiums.

The upfront cost for these refinances will be a miniscule .1% and the annual premium of .55%.  This matches the annual mortgage insurance cost for loans originated prior to October of 2010.

For homeowners who didn’t take advantage of refinancing since 2009, this is great news.  There are still a large group of homeowners who bought after May 31st, 2009 who need help, but I understand the need to service a portion of homeowners now and evaluate the success before opening the flood gates to everyone else.  Hopefully in time they’ll move this date to loan originated prior to October 2010.   All homeowners who bought with an FHA loan prior to October 2010 received a .55% annual premium, meaning the homeowners who took an FHA loan after May 2009 but before October 2010 would still be asked to take a higher mortgage insurance premium if they did a FHA streamline refinance.

Here’s a link to the announcement:

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=12-04ml.pdf

 

 

p5rn7vb
10 comments to Unable to benefit from HARP 2.0, FHA loan holders are being neglected
  • Thanks, Keane! I completely agree with your post. HUD needs to change their “net tangible benefit” guidelines which is preventing borrowers from being able to streamline refi from an ARM to a fixed period mortgage unless the pimi is 5% less… the annual mortgage insurance premium kills this 99% of the time.

  • Keane

    Rhonda,

    I just don’t understand how it makes sense to charge existing clients more money. The loan is already insured by FHA. They can charge a new Upfront MIP, fund FHA and help the clients lower their payment.

  • Juice

    I agree. The non grandfathering in MIP rates for FHA loans is outrageous. We don’t need to get into how FHA folks also are not getting any help. Let’s see they’re not eligible for the Department of Justice Settlement. For example our loan is owned by BofA and backed by FHA so not eligible. Also loan is not Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac so no Harpy Harpy. What a joke! Underwater thanks to these prick banks.

  • KStock

    Been trying to refinance my FHA loan for 3 years now. I am printing this info and taking it to the bank. Wish me luck and hope it works. I actually said recently that I would vote for whoever could refinance my house… we’ll see…

  • Kstock,

    Good luck! The month you closed on your FHA loan in 2009 will make a big difference on your options.

  • They use a free service allowing that you watch some of the most current episodes from some current TV shows.
    This is in part, because countries with far more advanced business ethics
    than Asia business ethics demand that Asia gets onboard and
    do more than simply discuss improving business ethics,
    truly do so. The responsibility of Asia China pharmaceutical market consultant is usually to implement the merchandise inside the pharmaceutical
    market in Asia. Indians may also be leader in several other fields
    including i . t . and is producing more amount of
    professionals in comparison with every other country.

  • Newer technologies and advanced tools have made it possible
    for cosmetic surgeons to carry out the highly delicate surgical
    procedures with more confidence and mitigated risk factors.
    And a proficient plastic surgeon with a lot of experience,
    can take that even further. The various types of plastic surgery on the face are:.

    Feel free to surf to my web blog; jonny lee Miller

  • Before rushing into any financial decision, research all the options available and find what
    payment option is best for you. A few indulgent upgrades to build cooking more interesting are welcome enhancements,
    too. Here are the step-by-step instructions for
    refinishing old appliances in stainless steel paint, a
    home improvement project for women with old appliances but a modern sense of style.

    my web blog; home owner association bob smith plumbing pompano beach

  • You need to know not only which kind of investment is the best at any particular time but also which sub-type with the investment category you
    should think and when in the market cycle is going to be the
    most excellent time to purchase for you to become a successful
    investor. They offer variety of relocation services also within the budgets of clients.
    It’s not easy to sever ties with the place you’ve grown up
    in and so used to living in, a place you call home and a place you’d probably
    always be attached to.

    Feel free to surf to my web site – west palm beach piano movers

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>